The University of East Anglia’s PR department is probably really scrambling this week setting up sensitivity training and putting out emails about the proper use of email after the New York Times printed an article about some hacked emails in which some climatology scientist wrote some rather inflammatory things including calling their climate change opponents “idiots” and using statistical “tricks.”
Sometimes, it is hard to be a scientist.
The root of it seems to be an us versus them attitude in the science community. Scientists are the great receivers of knowledge and everyone else … well, don’t worry your pretty little heads the scientist will tell you what’s going on.
These top-down communication models, even in the best circumstances, seem abusive.
It’s no wonder that scientists can’t get any traction on some major issues.
According to the Pew Research Center 32 percent of Americans polled accepted the idea of evolution, and 49 percent believed in global warming. Most scientists agree that there is a large knowledge gap.
Scientist should definitely look into a re-branding campaign.
Scientist like Albert Einstein, Louis Pasteur and Marie Curie are like rock legends but we need some more new stars that want to share with the public their work and their passion.
Will this ever happen? Will scientists willfully choose to descend from Olympus? I hope so.
Meanwhile I bet there’s an IT person who read this NYT article and thought “idiots.”
Picture of Lokey Laboratory courtesy of Wolfram Burner at Flickr.com.

